The Association Between Cognitive Reserve and Cognitive Trajectories Among Older Adults
Innovation in aging
Innov Aging. 2024 Feb 14;8(2):igae014. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae014. eCollection 2024.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prior studies on cognitive reserve (CR) and cognitive trajectories are limited and have had conflicting results. Furthermore, most studies have used a single measure of CR that may not reflect a comprehensive exposure. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of individual and composite CR measures on cognitive decline over a 6-year period.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 55,340 participants from 16 European countries, aged 50 and older, who participated in the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe. We used cognitive measures (including immediate memory, delayed memory, verbal fluency, and numeracy) and 3 CR factors (education, occupation, and cognitive activities) collected in 4 waves from 2011 to 2017. Structural equation modeling was used to construct the composite CR score, analyzed as tertile. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the study aims.
RESULTS: At baseline, the highest composite CR tertile was associated with a higher cognition score than the middle and lowest CR tertiles (β: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.29 to -0.26; β: -0.71, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.70, respectively), as well as for all individual cognitive domains. At longitudinal results, compared with the lowest CR, the highest but not the middle CR tertile demonstrated a slower 6-year decline in global cognition (β: -0.02, 95 % CI: -0.03 to -0.01), as well as in all cognitive domains (p < .05).
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: A composite CR could be a protective factor for cognitive performance and cognitive decline, and it is more sensitive and inclusive than an individual CR indicator alone.
